Chiropractic, Sex and Exorcisms

I have numerous Google alerts covering a variety of topics so I can have content pushed to me every day rather than having to search for it. The 'Chiropractic' alert rarely has any content of interest. It is mostly advertisements for chiropractic services or infomercials. Unlike the other pseudo-medicine alerts, there is little science in the feeds.

And unlike the other pseudo-medicine alerts, there are occasionally reports of various disciplinary actions against chiropractors. I do not report these in the Points of Interest, as I figure that there are dirt balls who will take advantage of patients, both financially or otherwise, in all fields.

But this one caught my eye: Iowa chiropractor admits exorcisms and bartering sex for treatment of patients. It wasn't the sex I found odd, but exorcisms.

 

The legal complaint specifically states

Respondant performs exorcisms as part of this chiropractic treatment of patients.

Now trading sex for treatment is repellent and obviously violated any number of ethical and other principals, but how does the exorcisms fit in? He is charged with violating the principals of chiropractic ethics and the code referenced includes

43.2(2) The principal objective of the chiropractic profession is to render service to humanity with full respect for the dignity of the person. Chiropractic physicians should merit the confidence of patients entrusted to their care, rendering to each a full measure of service and devotion.

43.2(3) Chiropractic physicians should strive continually to improve chiropractic knowledge and skill, and should make available to their patients and colleagues the benefits of their professional attainments.

43.2(4) A chiropractic physician should practice a method of healing founded on a scientific basis, and should not voluntarily associate professionally with anyone who violates this principle.

None of these statutes would seem to preclude exorcism.

The practice of chiropractic, as spelled out in the statutes, includes subluxations and acupuncture

... the insertion of acupuncture needles and the application of moxibustion to specific areas of the human body based upon oriental medical diagnosis as a primary mode of therapy. Adjunctive therapies within the scope of acupuncture may include manual, mechanical, thermal, electrical, and electromagnetic treatment, and the recommendation of dietary guidelines and therapeutic exercise based on traditional oriental medicine concepts.

All pseudo-medicines not based in reality. Is exorcism any different than subluxations or electromagnatic acupuncture? I can't see how.

By their very definition, the practice of chiropractic in Iowa violates 43.2(4), since nothing they do is "founded on a scientific basis." I can find nothing in the statues that would render an exorcism as being "practice outside the scope of the profession" of chiropractic.

He needs to be punished for improper sexual contact with patients, but given the practice of chiropractic, exorcism seems no different from much of what is routine chiropractic practice.

Chiropractors managing herpes?
Points of Interest 04/16/2015

Related Posts

 

Overall Rating (0)

0 out of 5 stars

Leave your comments

Post comment as a guest

0

People in this conversation

  • I follow and appreciate this blog regularly, but would be more apt to share it with others if you used more care in proofreading your posts. Simple spelling errors like using "statue" when you mean "statute" are just embarrassing.

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • I would not have noticed that error in a 1000 years. I have written well over a million words in the last 8 years on various blogs and they have taught me that I often miss simple mistakes, seeing what should be there than what actually is there. Want to be an editor? I would love someone to do a final proofread.

    Like 1 Short URL:
  • Guest - Guest

    The April 17 entry is misspelled "Points of Inerest"
    A spellchecker should've caught that one.
    Also, your nickname "sbmsdictator" is off-putting.

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • My Dear Mr. Reed,

    I’m as good a grammar nazi as the next old lady who thinks young people can’t spell or speak, but your pedantry is pathetic. You’re correct--It’s embarrassing. Embarrassing that you would take the time to point out a missing “t”. The context made the meaning clear, so what is so embarrassing?

    The good people who run this thingy do so for our benefit and on their own time. You know what? I didn’t even notice that TYPO (oh, the shame, how can I face the dawn?)--and there is a difference between a simple typo and the inabilitiy to spell. I could say something mean like, “get a life”, but I’m sure we are meant to keep things civil, so I won’t say something like that.

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • Guest - mark crislip

    thanks. fixed.
    spel chacker duzent doo tittles.

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • Guest - Guest

    Dear Mark's lapdog,

    Mark/sbmsdictator agreed above that he often misses simple mistakes.
    When I checked out this website, the first things that stood out were a typo in a title, and the nickname sbmsdictator. Not a big deal to me, because I know Mark, but does create an amateurish first impression to newcomers.
    Also, it reinforces the stereotype that doctors can't spell, which is scary considering that they write prescriptions.
    What's fine for a personal blog is more embarrassing for the Society for SBM that's supposed to be about high standards.

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • When I read the mission statement and other guiding and founding documents on this website, I get the impression the Society wishes to be taken seriously by the public at large, to serve as a persuasive force in the struggle to reclaim health care from those who would prefer to toss pseudo-science around as though it's worth more than a pile of steaming crap. I find that a worthy cause. I am of the opinion that to be taken seriously, especially when attempting to engage with people who disagree with you, one must present a polished, professional image. Mistakes as obvious as statue vs. statute do not look professional. They make it look like the author was in a hurry and was the only person to read the post before it was published.

    When proper care is not taken with something I care about, I feel compelled to try to help improve it. Thus, I pointed out the error to the author. My comment was not snarky; it was not insulting. It was a simple statement of fact made in good faith with a goal of improving the message of this website. If darwinslapdog has a problem with that, it's their problem -- certainly not mine. Please do your troll hunting elsewhere.

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • I wish I could determine whether this comment is sarcasm or not.

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • Again, in all seriousness, anyone want to step up and be a proofreader? I work on this site at the end of the day, after work and family and other committments and just before bed. You know, 'free' time. Minor mistakes are always going to be missed.

    Like 0 Short URL: